ZSCAN2

Chr 15

zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 2

Also known as: ZFP29, ZNF854

The protein encoded by this gene contains several copies of zinc finger motif, which is commonly found in transcriptional regulatory proteins. Studies in mice show that this gene is expressed during embryonic development, and specifically in the testis in adult mice, suggesting that it may play a role in regulating genes in germ cells. Alternative splicing of this gene results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.80
Clinical SummaryZSCAN2
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
100 VUS of 111 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.80LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.28
OE 0.48 (0.300.80)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
-0.10Z-score
OE missense 1.02 (0.931.11)
361 obs / 355.6 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.48 (0.300.80)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.02 (0.931.11)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.20
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 11 / 22.7Missense obs/exp: 361 / 355.6Syn Z: -1.84

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.78top 25%
GOF
0.72top 25%
LOF
0.3162th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

111 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS100
Likely Benign6
Benign1
100
VUS
6
Likely Benign
1
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
100
0
0
100
Likely Benign
0
5
1
0
6
Benign
1
0
0
0
1
Total110510107

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

32 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 59) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap ZSCAN2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ZSCAN2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →