ACMG/AMP classifier

Tavtigian 2020 points · Richards 2015 cross-check · a decision aid

VUS-Low?+0 pts

Balance of evidence

◀ benignpathogenic ▶0B: ≤ -7 pointsBLB: -6 to -1 pointsLBVUS-Low: 0 to +1 pointsVUS-LowVUS-Mid: +2 to +3 pointsVUS-MidVUS-High: +4 to +5 pointsVUS-HighLP: +6 to +9 pointsLPP: ≥ +10 pointsP-7-10+6+10
pathogenic, from the databenign, from the dataadded by you
Variant & dataEnter the variant and its data▾

Session

Variant

Population & Computational Evidence

Gene Constraint

gnomAD missense constraint metrics — the basis for PP2 on missense variants. Source: gnomAD › Gene page › Constraint tab.

Enter Z-score or O/E CI to see constraint tier.

Opens the report below — always reflects the current state

From the data

Switch off or re-weight any.

Enter a variant above, or open the classifier from a variant page.

What you can add

Family, patient and literature evidence.

Ordered for a
gene.Set the inheritance pattern to put the levers that usually decide first.

Inheritance?

up to +4 → VUS

Was the variant tested in the parents?

Second allele (recessive disorders) PM3?

Does this affected patient carry another variant in the gene?

Phenotype PP4 · BP5?

How well does the patient’s phenotype point to this gene, and has anything else been found?

PP4 applies once other likely causes have been looked for.

Segregation?

up to +4 → VUS

Informative meioses in one family where affected relatives carry the variant

Functional data?

up to +1 → VUS

A published assay of this exact variant

Seen in other patients PS4?

The same variant in unrelated people with the same disorder (your own patients or the literature)

Doesn’t segregate BS4?

An affected relative who does not carry the variant

Found with a pathogenic variant BP2?

Is the variant in trans with a pathogenic variant (dominant, fully penetrant disorder), or in cis with one?

A reputable source’s classification PP5 · BP6?

A lab, expert group or publication classified this variant, and you can’t see the evidence behind it

All ACMG criteria0 of 28 applied▾

Auto-Apply Computable Criteria

Applies BA1, BS1, PM2 (Supporting), PP2, or BP7 based on fetched gnomAD, SpliceAI, and constraint data.

▲

Pathogenic Evidence

0 criteria applied

Very Strong

PVS1PVS (+8)

Null variant in LOF gene

Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice site ±1/2, initiation codon, exon deletion) in gene where LOF is known mechanism.

Strong

PS1PS (+4)

Same amino acid change as established pathogenic

Same amino acid change as established pathogenic variant, regardless of nucleotide change.

PS2PS (+4)

De novo (confirmed with parental testing)

De novo variant (confirmed maternity and paternity) in a patient with disease and no family history.

PS3PS (+4)

Well-established functional studies — damaging

Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.

PS4PS (+4)

Variant prevalence in affected >> controls

Prevalence of variant in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls.

Moderate

PM1PM (+2)

Mutational hot spot / well-established functional domain

Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain (without benign variation).

PM2PM (+2)

Absent/extremely rare in population databases

Absent from controls or extremely low AF in gnomAD (PopMax AF < disease-specific threshold).

PM3PM (+2)

In trans with pathogenic variant (recessive)

For recessive disorders: variant detected in trans with a known pathogenic variant.

PM4PM (+2)

Protein length change (in-frame indel)

Protein length changes due to in-frame indels or stop-loss variants in non-repeat regions, or stop-loss variants.

PM5PM (+2)

Novel missense at same codon as established pathogenic

Novel missense change at same position as established pathogenic missense variant (different amino acid).

PM6PM (+2)

Assumed de novo (parentage not confirmed)

Assumed de novo, without confirmation of parentage (PS2 strength reduced due to unconfirmed parentage).

Supporting

PP1PP (+1)

Cosegregation in multiple affected family members

Cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause disease.

PP2PP (+1)

Missense in gene with low benign missense rate

Missense variant in gene where missense variants are a common mechanism AND benign missense variation rare.

PP3PP (+1)

Computational evidence supports damaging effect

Multiple lines of computational evidence (conservation, splicing, functional prediction) support damaging effect.

PP4PP (+1)

Phenotype highly specific for this gene

Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a single-gene disorder with established gene association.

PP5PP (+1)

Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic

Reputable source recently classified variant as pathogenic but evidence not available to the evaluating lab.

▼

Benign Evidence

Stand-alone

BA1BA (-8)

Allele frequency > 5% in population databases

Allele frequency > 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or gnomAD (stand-alone benign).

Strong

BS1BS (-4)

Allele frequency greater than expected for disorder

Allele frequency greater than expected for the disorder (below BA1 threshold but inconsistent with disease prevalence).

BS2BS (-4)

Observed in healthy adults (fully penetrant condition)

Observed in a healthy adult individual for a fully penetrant dominant, recessive, or X-linked condition with adult onset.

BS3BS (-4)

Functional studies — no damaging effect

Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.

BS4BS (-4)

Lack of segregation in affected family members

Lack of segregation in affected members of a family in a gene definitively known to cause disease.

Supporting

BP1BP (-1)

Missense in gene where only LOF causes disease

Missense variant in gene where only truncating variants are known to cause disease.

BP2BP (-1)

In trans with pathogenic variant in dominant gene / in cis with pathogenic in recessive

Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant AD disorder OR in cis with a pathogenic variant in an AR gene.

BP3BP (-1)

In-frame indel in repeat region without known function

In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function.

BP4BP (-1)

Computational evidence supports benign effect

Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest benign impact on gene/gene product.

BP5BP (-1)

Variant found in case with alternate molecular explanation

Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.

BP6BP (-1)

Reputable source reports variant as benign

Reputable source recently classified variant as benign but evidence not available to evaluating lab.

BP7BP (-1)

Synonymous variant — no predicted splicing impact

Synonymous variant predicted to have no impact on splicing.

Reportcriteria and rationale, ready to copy▾

Final Classification

VUS-Low?

Score: 0 · 0 criteria

—

—

ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Report

Generated: 2026-10-25

Section 1 — ACMG/AMP Variant Classification

Prior: 0.10 (Tavtigian 2020)

VUS-Low?
Net score 0Posterior 0.100LR ×1.0 pathogenicRichards cross-check VUS

Applied Criteria (0)

No criteria applied

Section 2 — Inheritance

Inheritance / de novo: Unknown

Parental testing: Not confirmed

References

Richards S, et al. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405-424. PMID 25741868

Tavtigian SV, et al. Genet Med. 2020;22(10):1569-1577. PMID 32720330

Abou Tayoun AN, et al. Hum Mutat. 2018;39(11):1517-1524. PMID 30192042

Pejaver V, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109(12):2121-2137. PMID 36413997

This classification is based on evidence available at time of analysis. Variant interpretation may change as new evidence emerges. Formal classification must be performed by a qualified geneticist or genetic counselor following laboratory-specific SOPs.

A decision aid; formal classification is made by a qualified geneticist or genetic counsellor.