ACMG/AMP classifier
Tavtigian 2020 points · Richards 2015 cross-check · a decision aid
Balance of evidence
Variant & dataEnter the variant and its data▾
Session
Variant
Population & Computational Evidence
Gene Constraint
gnomAD missense constraint metrics — the basis for PP2 on missense variants. Source: gnomAD › Gene page › Constraint tab.
Enter Z-score or O/E CI to see constraint tier.
Opens the report below — always reflects the current state
From the data
Switch off or re-weight any.
Enter a variant above, or open the classifier from a variant page.
What you can add
Family, patient and literature evidence.
Inheritance?
up to +4 → VUSWas the variant tested in the parents?
Second allele (recessive disorders) PM3?
Does this affected patient carry another variant in the gene?
Phenotype PP4 · BP5?
How well does the patient’s phenotype point to this gene, and has anything else been found?
PP4 applies once other likely causes have been looked for.
Segregation?
up to +4 → VUSInformative meioses in one family where affected relatives carry the variant
Functional data?
up to +1 → VUSA published assay of this exact variant
Seen in other patients PS4?
The same variant in unrelated people with the same disorder (your own patients or the literature)
Doesn’t segregate BS4?
An affected relative who does not carry the variant
Found with a pathogenic variant BP2?
Is the variant in trans with a pathogenic variant (dominant, fully penetrant disorder), or in cis with one?
A reputable source’s classification PP5 · BP6?
A lab, expert group or publication classified this variant, and you can’t see the evidence behind it
All ACMG criteria0 of 28 applied▾
Auto-Apply Computable Criteria
Applies BA1, BS1, PM2 (Supporting), PP2, or BP7 based on fetched gnomAD, SpliceAI, and constraint data.
Pathogenic Evidence
0 criteria appliedVery Strong
Null variant in LOF gene
Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical splice site ±1/2, initiation codon, exon deletion) in gene where LOF is known mechanism.
Strong
Same amino acid change as established pathogenic
Same amino acid change as established pathogenic variant, regardless of nucleotide change.
De novo (confirmed with parental testing)
De novo variant (confirmed maternity and paternity) in a patient with disease and no family history.
Well-established functional studies — damaging
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Variant prevalence in affected >> controls
Prevalence of variant in affected individuals significantly increased compared with controls.
Moderate
Mutational hot spot / well-established functional domain
Located in a mutational hot spot or well-established functional domain (without benign variation).
Absent/extremely rare in population databases
Absent from controls or extremely low AF in gnomAD (PopMax AF < disease-specific threshold).
In trans with pathogenic variant (recessive)
For recessive disorders: variant detected in trans with a known pathogenic variant.
Protein length change (in-frame indel)
Protein length changes due to in-frame indels or stop-loss variants in non-repeat regions, or stop-loss variants.
Novel missense at same codon as established pathogenic
Novel missense change at same position as established pathogenic missense variant (different amino acid).
Assumed de novo (parentage not confirmed)
Assumed de novo, without confirmation of parentage (PS2 strength reduced due to unconfirmed parentage).
Supporting
Cosegregation in multiple affected family members
Cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause disease.
Missense in gene with low benign missense rate
Missense variant in gene where missense variants are a common mechanism AND benign missense variation rare.
Computational evidence supports damaging effect
Multiple lines of computational evidence (conservation, splicing, functional prediction) support damaging effect.
Phenotype highly specific for this gene
Patient's phenotype or family history highly specific for a single-gene disorder with established gene association.
Reputable source reports variant as pathogenic
Reputable source recently classified variant as pathogenic but evidence not available to the evaluating lab.
Benign Evidence
Stand-alone
Allele frequency > 5% in population databases
Allele frequency > 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or gnomAD (stand-alone benign).
Strong
Allele frequency greater than expected for disorder
Allele frequency greater than expected for the disorder (below BA1 threshold but inconsistent with disease prevalence).
Observed in healthy adults (fully penetrant condition)
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a fully penetrant dominant, recessive, or X-linked condition with adult onset.
Functional studies — no damaging effect
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Lack of segregation in affected family members
Lack of segregation in affected members of a family in a gene definitively known to cause disease.
Supporting
Missense in gene where only LOF causes disease
Missense variant in gene where only truncating variants are known to cause disease.
In trans with pathogenic variant in dominant gene / in cis with pathogenic in recessive
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant AD disorder OR in cis with a pathogenic variant in an AR gene.
In-frame indel in repeat region without known function
In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function.
Computational evidence supports benign effect
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest benign impact on gene/gene product.
Variant found in case with alternate molecular explanation
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Reputable source reports variant as benign
Reputable source recently classified variant as benign but evidence not available to evaluating lab.
Synonymous variant — no predicted splicing impact
Synonymous variant predicted to have no impact on splicing.
Reportcriteria and rationale, ready to copy▾
Final Classification
VUS-Low?Score: 0 · 0 criteria
—
—
ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Report
Generated: 2026-10-25
Section 1 — ACMG/AMP Variant Classification
Prior: 0.10 (Tavtigian 2020)
Applied Criteria (0)
No criteria applied
Section 2 — Inheritance
Inheritance / de novo: Unknown
Parental testing: Not confirmed
References
Richards S, et al. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405-424. PMID 25741868
Tavtigian SV, et al. Genet Med. 2020;22(10):1569-1577. PMID 32720330
Abou Tayoun AN, et al. Hum Mutat. 2018;39(11):1517-1524. PMID 30192042
Pejaver V, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109(12):2121-2137. PMID 36413997
This classification is based on evidence available at time of analysis. Variant interpretation may change as new evidence emerges. Formal classification must be performed by a qualified geneticist or genetic counselor following laboratory-specific SOPs.
A decision aid; formal classification is made by a qualified geneticist or genetic counsellor.