WDR24

Chr 16

WD repeat domain 24

Also known as: C16orf21, JFP7

Enables ubiquitin protein ligase activity. Involved in several processes, including cellular response to amino acid starvation; positive regulation of TORC1 signaling; and protein K6-linked ubiquitination. Located in cytosol and lysosomal membrane. Part of GATOR2 complex. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

0
Active trials
48
Pathogenic / LP
188
ClinVar variants
1
Pubs (1 yr)
2.8
Missense Z
0.68
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryWDR24
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
48 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 126 VUS of 188 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

pubtator: Error: PubTator3 HTTP 502

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.68LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.92
OE 0.43 (0.280.68)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
2.79Z-score
OE missense 0.67 (0.610.73)
378 obs / 564.8 exp
Mild constraint

Moderately missense-constrained (top ~2.5%)

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.43 (0.280.68)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.67 (0.610.73)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.27
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 13 / 30.4Missense obs/exp: 378 / 564.8Syn Z: -3.40
DN
0.6647th %ile
GOF
0.4874th %ile
LOF
0.4037th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

188 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic48
VUS126
Likely Benign8
Benign6
48
Pathogenic
126
VUS
8
Likely Benign
6
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
48
0
48
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
2
107
17
0
126
Likely Benign
0
4
2
2
8
Benign
0
0
6
0
6
Total2111732188

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

WDR24 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →