WARS2

Chr 1AR

tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase 2, mitochondrial

Also known as: NEMMLAS, PKDYS3, TrpRS, mtTrpRS

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the aminoacylation of tRNA by their cognate amino acid. Because of their central role in linking amino acids with nucleotide triplets contained in tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are thought to be among the first proteins that appeared in evolution. Two forms of tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase exist, a cytoplasmic form, named WARS, and a mitochondrial form, named WARS2. This gene encodes the mitochondrial tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase. Two alternative transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

GeneReviewsOMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
DNmechanismARLOEUF 0.672 OMIM phenotypes
Clinical SummaryWARS2
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
mitochondrial disease · ARDefinitive

Definitive — sufficient evidence for diagnostic panels

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.32) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
19 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 89 VUS of 182 total submissions
📖
GeneReview available — WARS2
Authoritative clinical overview · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.67LOEUF
pLI 0.051
Z-score 2.52
OE 0.32 (0.170.67)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.90Z-score
OE missense 0.83 (0.730.94)
174 obs / 210.9 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.32 (0.170.67)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.83 (0.730.94)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.91
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 15.8Missense obs/exp: 174 / 210.9Syn Z: 0.69

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.74top 25%
GOF
0.5955th %ile
LOF
0.2970th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

182 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic8
Likely Pathogenic11
VUS89
Likely Benign46
Benign13
Conflicting10
8
Pathogenic
11
Likely Pathogenic
89
VUS
46
Likely Benign
13
Benign
10
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
5
2
1
0
8
Likely Pathogenic
2
9
0
0
11
VUS
9
77
3
0
89
Likely Benign
2
5
7
32
46
Benign
0
3
6
4
13
Conflicting
10
Total18961736177

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

10 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 22) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap WARS2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

WARS2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →