VWA3B

Chr 2AR

von Willebrand factor A domain containing 3B

Also known as: SCAR22

This gene encodes an intracellular protein that contains a von Willebrand factor type A domain. Intracellular proteins with VWA domains are thought to function in transcription, DNA repair, ribosomal and membrane transport and the proteasome. Mutations in this gene are associated with Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive 22. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2017]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismARLOEUF 0.941 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryVWA3B
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
11 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 196 VUS of 295 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.94LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.97
OE 0.75 (0.600.94)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.26Z-score
OE missense 0.97 (0.911.04)
678 obs / 697.2 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.75 (0.600.94)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.97 (0.911.04)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.97
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 52 / 69.7Missense obs/exp: 678 / 697.2Syn Z: 0.34

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6065th %ile
GOF
0.6540th %ile
LOF
0.4037th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and loss-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
LOF91% of P/LP variants are LoF

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312. Mechanism ranking also informed by gnomAD constraint, ClinVar, and ClinGen data.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

295 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic1
Likely Pathogenic10
VUS196
Likely Benign48
Benign20
Conflicting4
1
Pathogenic
10
Likely Pathogenic
196
VUS
48
Likely Benign
20
Benign
4
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
1
0
0
1
Likely Pathogenic
10
0
0
0
10
VUS
10
182
4
0
196
Likely Benign
1
25
4
18
48
Benign
2
8
5
5
20
Conflicting
4
Total232161323279

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

14 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 20) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap VWA3B — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

VWA3B · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →