VKORC1

Chr 16ARAD

vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1

Involved in vitamin K metabolism. Catalytic subunit of the vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKOR) complex which reduces inactive vitamin K 2,3-epoxide to active vitamin K. Vitamin K is required for the gamma-carboxylation of various proteins, including clotting factors, and is required for normal blood coagulation, but also for normal bone development

Primary Disease Associations & Inheritance

Vitamin K-dependent clotting factors, combined deficiency of, 2MIM #607473
AR
Warfarin resistanceMIM #122700
AD
UniProtCoumarin resistance
75
ClinVar variants
19
Pathogenic / LP
0.16
pLI score
1
Active trials
Clinical SummaryVKORC1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.32) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
19 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 30 VUS of 75 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
1 active or recruiting trial — potential therapeutic options may be available

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
1.02LOEUF
pLI 0.162
Z-score 1.55
OE 0.32 (0.131.02)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.31Z-score
OE missense 0.91 (0.761.09)
85 obs / 93.3 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.32 (0.131.02)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.91 (0.761.09)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.90
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 2 / 6.2Missense obs/exp: 85 / 93.3Syn Z: 0.54

ClinVar Variant Classifications

75 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic14
Likely Pathogenic5
VUS30
Likely Benign6
Benign6
Conflicting1
14
Pathogenic
5
Likely Pathogenic
30
VUS
6
Likely Benign
6
Benign
1
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
3
11
0
14
Likely Pathogenic
0
2
3
0
5
VUS
0
12
13
5
30
Likely Benign
0
2
3
1
6
Benign
0
3
2
1
6
Conflicting
1
Total02232762

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

VKORC1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

OMIM — Genotype-Phenotype Relationships

1 OMIM entry

Vitamin K-dependent clotting factors, combined deficiency of, 2

MIM #607473

Molecular basis of disorder known

Autosomal recessive

Warfarin resistance

MIM #122700

Molecular basis of disorder known

Autosomal dominant
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Key Publications
Landmark & review papers · by relevance
PubMed
Warfarin pharmacogenetics.
Johnson JA et al.·Trends Cardiovasc Med
2015Review
[Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics].
Scibona P et al.·Arch Cardiol Mex
2014Review
Warfarin pharmacogenomics.
Cavallari LH et al.·Curr Opin Mol Ther
2009Review
Pharmacogenetics-based coumarin therapy.
Gage BF·Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program
2006Review
Warfarin pharmacogenetics.
Limdi NA et al.·Pharmacotherapy
2008Review
Genomics of bleeding disorders.
Goodeve AC et al.·Haemophilia
2014Review
Cardiovascular pharmacogenomics: expectations and practical benefits.
Turner RM et al.·Clin Pharmacol Ther
2014Review
Top 10 resultsSearch PubMed ↗