TSPAN1

Chr 1

tetraspanin 1

Also known as: NET1, TM4C, TM4SF

The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the transmembrane 4 superfamily, also known as the tetraspanin family. Most of these members are cell-surface proteins that are characterized by the presence of four hydrophobic domains. The proteins mediate signal transduction events that play a role in the regulation of cell development, activation, growth and motility. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.37
Clinical SummaryTSPAN1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
214 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 438 VUS of 1318 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.37LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.67
OE 0.79 (0.471.37)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.54Z-score
OE missense 0.87 (0.741.01)
113 obs / 130.5 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.79 (0.471.37)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.87 (0.741.01)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.16
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 9 / 11.4Missense obs/exp: 113 / 130.5Syn Z: -0.92

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.84top 10%
GOF
0.77top 25%
LOF
0.1299th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

1318 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic62
Likely Pathogenic152
VUS438
Likely Benign540
Benign23
Conflicting79
62
Pathogenic
152
Likely Pathogenic
438
VUS
540
Likely Benign
23
Benign
79
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
53
5
3
1
62
Likely Pathogenic
124
24
4
0
152
VUS
14
367
43
14
438
Likely Benign
0
20
302
218
540
Benign
0
2
19
2
23
Conflicting
79
Total1914183712351,294

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

6 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 19) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap TSPAN1 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TSPAN1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →