TRIM36

Chr 5

tripartite motif containing 36

Also known as: ANPH, ANPH1, HAPRIN, RBCC728, RNF98

The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the tripartite motif (TRIM) family. The TRIM motif includes three zinc-binding domains, a RING, a B-box type 1 and a B-box type 2, and a coiled-coil region. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants that encode different protein isoforms have been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.66
Clinical SummaryTRIM36
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
1 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 98 VUS of 127 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

omim: Error: OMIM fetch failed: 429

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.66LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 3.04
OE 0.41 (0.270.66)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
-0.40Z-score
OE missense 1.06 (0.971.15)
406 obs / 384.1 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.41 (0.270.66)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.06 (0.971.15)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.19
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 13 / 31.4Missense obs/exp: 406 / 384.1Syn Z: -1.73

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7325th %ile
GOF
0.6834th %ile
LOF
0.2777th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

127 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic1
VUS98
Likely Benign6
Benign11
1
Pathogenic
98
VUS
6
Likely Benign
11
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
1
0
0
1
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
98
0
0
98
Likely Benign
0
3
0
3
6
Benign
0
4
2
5
11
Total010628116

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

26 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 29) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap TRIM36 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TRIM36 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →