TRIM16

Chr 17

tripartite motif containing 16

Also known as: EBBP

The protein encoded by this gene is a tripartite motif (TRIM) family member that contains two B box domains and a coiled-coiled region that are characteristic of the B box zinc finger protein family. While it lacks a RING domain found in other TRIM proteins, the encoded protein can homodimerize or heterodimerize with other TRIM proteins and has E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. This gene is also a tumor suppressor and is involved in secretory autophagy. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2017]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.13
Clinical SummaryTRIM16
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
86 VUS of 104 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.13LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.10
OE 0.74 (0.501.13)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.34Z-score
OE missense 0.95 (0.861.04)
300 obs / 316.8 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.74 (0.501.13)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.95 (0.861.04)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.88
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 16 / 21.5Missense obs/exp: 300 / 316.8Syn Z: 1.10

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.75top 25%
GOF
0.76top 25%
LOF
0.2484th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

104 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS86
Likely Benign9
Benign1
86
VUS
9
Likely Benign
1
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
86
0
0
86
Likely Benign
0
7
0
2
9
Benign
0
1
0
0
1
Total0940296

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

19 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 23) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap TRIM16 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TRIM16 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →