TNK2

Chr 3

tyrosine kinase non receptor 2

Also known as: ACK, ACK-1, ACK1, p21cdc42Hs

This gene encodes a tyrosine kinase that binds Cdc42Hs in its GTP-bound form and inhibits both the intrinsic and GTPase-activating protein (GAP)-stimulated GTPase activity of Cdc42Hs. This binding is mediated by a unique sequence of 47 amino acids C-terminal to an SH3 domain. The protein may be involved in a regulatory mechanism that sustains the GTP-bound active form of Cdc42Hs and which is directly linked to a tyrosine phosphorylation signal transduction pathway. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified from this gene, but the full-length nature of only two transcript variants has been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.80
Clinical SummaryTNK2
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
1 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 322 VUS of 525 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.80LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.61
OE 0.57 (0.420.80)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
-0.20Z-score
OE missense 1.02 (0.961.09)
710 obs / 695.0 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.57 (0.420.80)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.02 (0.961.09)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.36
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 25 / 43.6Missense obs/exp: 710 / 695.0Syn Z: -4.89

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7229th %ile
GOF
0.77top 25%
LOF
0.3358th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

525 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic1
VUS322
Likely Benign118
Benign44
Conflicting10
1
Pathogenic
322
VUS
118
Likely Benign
44
Benign
10
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
1
0
0
1
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
7
299
16
0
322
Likely Benign
1
13
29
75
118
Benign
0
8
7
29
44
Conflicting
10
Total832152104495

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

42 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 61) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap TNK2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TNK2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →