TNFRSF9

Chr 1AR

TNF receptor superfamily member 9

Also known as: 4-1BB, CD137, CDw137, ILA, IMD109

The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the TNF-receptor superfamily. This receptor contributes to the clonal expansion, survival, and development of T cells. It can also induce proliferation in peripheral monocytes, enhance T cell apoptosis induced by TCR/CD3 triggered activation, and regulate CD28 co-stimulation to promote Th1 cell responses. The expression of this receptor is induced by lymphocyte activation. TRAF adaptor proteins have been shown to bind to this receptor and transduce the signals leading to activation of NF-kappaB. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismARLOEUF 0.611 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryTNFRSF9
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
immunodeficiency 109 with lymphoproliferation · ARDefinitive

Definitive — sufficient evidence for diagnostic panels

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.23) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
15 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 86 VUS of 209 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
1 active or recruiting trial — potential therapeutic options may be available

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.61LOEUF
pLI 0.322
Z-score 2.54
OE 0.23 (0.110.61)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.36Z-score
OE missense 0.92 (0.801.06)
134 obs / 146.4 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.23 (0.110.61)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.92 (0.801.06)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.00
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 3 / 12.8Missense obs/exp: 134 / 146.4Syn Z: -0.01

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6840th %ile
GOF
0.6638th %ile
LOF
0.2873th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

209 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic10
Likely Pathogenic5
VUS86
Likely Benign83
Benign12
Conflicting2
10
Pathogenic
5
Likely Pathogenic
86
VUS
83
Likely Benign
12
Benign
2
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
9
0
1
0
10
Likely Pathogenic
4
0
1
0
5
VUS
2
72
10
2
86
Likely Benign
0
3
36
44
83
Benign
0
1
8
3
12
Conflicting
2
Total15765649198

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

42 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 51) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap TNFRSF9 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TNFRSF9 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.