TM4SF5

Chr 17

transmembrane 4 L six family member 5

The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the transmembrane 4 superfamily, also known as the tetraspanin family. Most of these members are cell-surface proteins that are characterized by the presence of four hydrophobic domains. The proteins mediate signal transduction events that play a role in the regulation of cell development, activation, growth and motility. This encoded protein is a cell surface glycoprotein and is highly similar in sequence and structure to transmembrane 4 superfamily member 1. It may play a role in cell proliferation, and overexpression of this protein may be associated with the uncontrolled growth of tumour cells. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.97
Clinical SummaryTM4SF5
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.01) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
23 VUS of 29 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.97LOEUF
pLI 0.008
Z-score 1.64
OE 0.46 (0.240.97)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.79Z-score
OE missense 0.81 (0.690.95)
108 obs / 133.9 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.46 (0.240.97)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.81 (0.690.95)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.91
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 10.8Missense obs/exp: 108 / 133.9Syn Z: 0.52

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7133th %ile
GOF
0.80top 10%
LOF
0.2583th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

29 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS23
Likely Benign1
23
VUS
1
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
23
0
0
23
Likely Benign
0
1
0
0
1
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total0240024

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

23 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 36) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap TM4SF5 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TM4SF5 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →