TLR8

Chr XSomaticX-linked

toll like receptor 8

Also known as: CD288, IMD98, TLR-8, hTLR8

The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family which plays a fundamental role in pathogen recognition and activation of innate immunity. TLRs are highly conserved from Drosophila to humans and share structural and functional similarities. They recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are expressed on infectious agents, and mediate the production of cytokines necessary for the development of effective immunity. The various TLRs exhibit different patterns of expression. This gene is predominantly expressed in lung and peripheral blood leukocytes, and lies in close proximity to another family member, TLR7, on chromosome X. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismSomatic/X-linkedLOEUF 0.491 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryTLR8
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.23) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
5 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 68 VUS of 138 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
2 active or recruiting trials — potential therapeutic options may be available

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?
0.49LOEUF
pLI 0.324
Z-score 3.31
OE 0.23 (0.120.49)
Moderately constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?
3.08Z-score
OE missense 0.56 (0.500.63)
218 obs / 389.2 exp
Mild constraint

Moderately missense-constrained (top ~2.5%)

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.23 (0.120.49)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.56 (0.500.63)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.00
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 21.6Missense obs/exp: 218 / 389.2Syn Z: -0.02

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6648th %ile
GOF
0.7029th %ile
LOF
0.3164th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

138 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic3
Likely Pathogenic2
VUS68
Likely Benign9
Benign9
Conflicting2
3
Pathogenic
2
Likely Pathogenic
68
VUS
9
Likely Benign
9
Benign
2
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
3
0
0
3
Likely Pathogenic
1
1
0
0
2
VUS
0
68
0
0
68
Likely Benign
0
5
0
4
9
Benign
0
2
0
7
9
Conflicting
2
Total17901193

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

71 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 75) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap TLR8 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TLR8 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.