TLR2

Chr 4ADSomatic

toll like receptor 2

Also known as: CD282, TIL4

TLR2 encodes a Toll-like receptor that recognizes bacterial lipoproteins and other microbial cell wall components, cooperating with TLR1 or TLR6 to activate innate immune responses through NF-kappa-B signaling and cytokine secretion. Mutations cause increased susceptibility to infections including leprosy and tuberculosis, as well as predisposition to colorectal cancer. The gene shows autosomal dominant inheritance with low constraint against loss-of-function variants (pLI near 0).

Summary from RefSeq, OMIM, UniProt
Research Assistant →

Primary Disease Associations & Inheritance

{Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to}MIM #114500
ADSomatic
{Leprosy, susceptibility to}MIM #246300
AD
{Mycobacterium tuberculosis, susceptibility to}MIM #607948
1
Active trials
913
Pubs (1 yr)
28
P/LP submissions
0%
P/LP missense
0.93
LOEUF
Multiple*
Mechanism· predicted
Clinical SummaryTLR2
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
28 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 89 VUS of 153 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
1 active or recruiting trial — potential therapeutic options may be available
📖
GeneReview available — TLR2
Authoritative clinical overview · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint
0.93LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.80
OE 0.59 (0.380.93)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint
0.41Z-score
OE missense 0.94 (0.871.03)
380 obs / 403.0 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios
LoF OE0.59 (0.380.93)
00.351.4
Missense OE0.94 (0.871.03)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE0.91
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 13 / 22.1Missense obs/exp: 380 / 403.0Syn Z: 0.94
DN
0.75top 25%
GOF
0.75top 25%
LOF
0.2092th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median · 1 literature citation
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Literature Evidence

DNThe TLR2-P631H mutant has a dominant negative effect on the wild type TLR2 signalling in transfected HEK293 kidney cells using the NF-kappaB-driven luciferase as a reporter gene with ligands like M. avium extracts, Pam3CysSK4 or FSL-1 that bind TLR2/TLR1 or TLR2/TLR6 heterodimers, respectively.PMID:20500688

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

153 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic25
Likely Pathogenic3
VUS89
Likely Benign17
Benign8
Conflicting3
25
Pathogenic
3
Likely Pathogenic
89
VUS
17
Likely Benign
8
Benign
3
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
25
0
25
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
3
0
3
VUS
1
84
4
0
89
Likely Benign
0
9
1
7
17
Benign
0
3
0
5
8
Conflicting
3
Total1963312145

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TLR2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Literature
Open Research Assistant →