TEPSIN

Chr 17

TEPSIN adaptor related protein complex 4 accessory protein

Associates with the adapter-like complex 4 (AP-4) and may therefore play a role in vesicular trafficking of proteins at the trans-Golgi network

0
Active trials
18
Pathogenic / LP
37
ClinVar variants
4
Pubs (1 yr)
-0.1
Missense Z
1.28
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryTEPSIN
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
18 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 9 VUS of 37 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
1.28LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.69
OE 0.82 (0.541.28)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
-0.08Z-score
OE missense 1.01 (0.921.11)
317 obs / 313.0 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.82 (0.541.28)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.1.01 (0.921.11)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.07
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 14 / 17.1Missense obs/exp: 317 / 313.0Syn Z: -0.66
DN
0.5576th %ile
GOF
0.6637th %ile
LOF
0.3941th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is gain-of-function.

GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

37 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic16
Likely Pathogenic2
VUS9
Likely Benign6
Benign4
16
Pathogenic
2
Likely Pathogenic
9
VUS
6
Likely Benign
4
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
16
0
16
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
2
0
2
VUS
0
8
1
0
9
Likely Benign
0
3
0
3
6
Benign
0
2
1
1
4
Total01320437

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TEPSIN · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Full-Text Mentions
NLP-detected gene mentions in article bodies · via PubTator3
PubTator3
Top 5 full-text resultsSearch PubTator3 ↗
Recent Gene-Specific Literature
Gene in title · MEDLINE · newest first
Europe PMC