This gene product belongs to the tektin family of proteins. Tektins comprise a family of filament-forming proteins that are coassembled with tubulins to form ciliary and flagellar microtubules. This gene is predominantly expressed in the testis and in mouse, tektin 1 mRNA was localized to the spermatocytes and round spermatids in the seminiferous tubules, indicating that it may play a role in spermatogenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.08
Clinical SummaryTEKT1
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
primary ciliary dyskinesia · ARDisputed

Disputed — evidence questions this relationship

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
72 VUS of 80 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

omim: Error: OMIM fetch failed: 429

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.08LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.30
OE 0.67 (0.431.08)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.13Z-score
OE missense 0.98 (0.881.09)
235 obs / 240.8 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.67 (0.431.08)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.98 (0.881.09)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.97
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 12 / 17.9Missense obs/exp: 235 / 240.8Syn Z: 0.25

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.81top 10%
GOF
0.81top 10%
LOF
0.1797th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

80 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS72
Likely Benign4
72
VUS
4
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
72
0
0
72
Likely Benign
0
3
1
0
4
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total0751076

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

20 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 28) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap TEKT1 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TEKT1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →