TBXA2R

Chr 19AD

thromboxane A2 receptor

Also known as: BDPLT13, TXA2-R

This gene encodes a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family. The protein interacts with thromboxane A2 to induce platelet aggregation and regulate hemostasis. A mutation in this gene results in a bleeding disorder. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Primary Disease Associations & Inheritance

{Bleeding disorder, platelet-type, 13, susceptibility to}MIM #614009
AD
0
Active trials
23
Pathogenic / LP
277
ClinVar variants
2
Pubs (1 yr)
1.1
Missense Z
1.36
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryTBXA2R
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
qualitative platelet defect · ADModerate

Moderate evidence — consider for supplementary testing

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
23 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 155 VUS of 277 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
1.36LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.78
OE 0.73 (0.411.36)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
1.07Z-score
OE missense 0.82 (0.740.92)
239 obs / 290.4 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.73 (0.411.36)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.82 (0.740.92)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.05
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 7 / 9.6Missense obs/exp: 239 / 290.4Syn Z: -0.43
DN
0.74top 25%
GOF
0.82top 10%
LOF
0.2580th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

277 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic18
Likely Pathogenic5
VUS155
Likely Benign72
Benign23
Conflicting4
18
Pathogenic
5
Likely Pathogenic
155
VUS
72
Likely Benign
23
Benign
4
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
18
0
18
Likely Pathogenic
1
2
2
0
5
VUS
3
127
25
0
155
Likely Benign
0
6
13
53
72
Benign
0
3
13
7
23
Conflicting
4
Total41387160277

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

TBXA2R · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence