SULT1E1

Chr 4

sulfotransferase family 1E member 1

Also known as: EST, EST-1, ST1E1, STE

Sulfotransferase enzymes catalyze the sulfate conjugation of many hormones, neurotransmitters, drugs, and xenobiotic compounds. These cytosolic enzymes are different in their tissue distributions and substrate specificities. The gene structure (number and length of exons) is similar among family members. This gene encodes a protein that transfers a sulfo moiety to and from estrone, which may control levels of estrogen receptors. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.27
Clinical SummarySULT1E1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
36 VUS of 50 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

omim: Error: OMIM fetch failed: 429

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.27LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.78
OE 0.78 (0.501.27)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.12Z-score
OE missense 0.97 (0.851.11)
148 obs / 152.2 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.78 (0.501.27)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.97 (0.851.11)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.91
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 12 / 15.3Missense obs/exp: 148 / 152.2Syn Z: 0.52

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7229th %ile
GOF
0.6541th %ile
LOF
0.1895th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

50 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS36
Likely Benign4
Benign2
36
VUS
4
Likely Benign
2
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
36
0
0
36
Likely Benign
0
1
0
3
4
Benign
0
0
0
2
2
Total0370542

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

22 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 36) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap SULT1E1 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

SULT1E1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →