SULT1A2

Chr 16

sulfotransferase family 1A member 2

Also known as: HAST4, P-PST, P-PST 2, ST1A2, STP2, TSPST2

Sulfotransferase enzymes catalyze the sulfate conjugation of many hormones, neurotransmitters, drugs, and xenobiotic compounds. These cytosolic enzymes are different in their tissue distributions and substrate specificities. The gene structure (number and length of exons) is similar among family members. This gene encodes one of two phenol sulfotransferases with thermostable enzyme activity. Two alternatively spliced variants that encode the same protein have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.58
Clinical SummarySULT1A2
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
60 VUS of 75 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.58LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score -0.23
OE 1.06 (0.731.58)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
-0.85Z-score
OE missense 1.18 (1.051.32)
211 obs / 179.2 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?1.06 (0.731.58)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.18 (1.051.32)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.06
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 17 / 16.0Missense obs/exp: 211 / 179.2Syn Z: -0.39

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6938th %ile
GOF
0.6637th %ile
LOF
0.2484th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

75 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS60
Likely Benign5
Benign1
60
VUS
5
Likely Benign
1
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
60
0
0
60
Likely Benign
0
5
0
0
5
Benign
1
0
0
0
1
Total1650066

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

71 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 95) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap SULT1A2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

SULT1A2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →