STPG4

Chr 2

sperm-tail PG-rich repeat containing 4

Also known as: C2orf61, GSE

The protein is a maternal factor that regulates epigenetic chromatin reprogramming during early zygotic development by inducing conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in gametic DNA demethylation. Currently, no human diseases have been definitively associated with STPG4 mutations in the medical literature. The gene shows low constraint against loss-of-function variants (pLI = 0.0001), suggesting that complete loss of function may be tolerated.

Summary from RefSeq, UniProt
Research Assistant →
0
Active trials
0
Pubs (1 yr)
14
P/LP submissions
P/LP missense
1.14
LOEUF
Multiple*
Mechanism· predicted
Clinical SummarySTPG4
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
14 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 7 VUS of 24 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint
1.14LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.21
OE 0.63 (0.371.14)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint
-0.86Z-score
OE missense 1.21 (1.061.38)
162 obs / 134.0 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios
LoF OE0.63 (0.371.14)
00.351.4
Missense OE1.21 (1.061.38)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE1.25
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 8 / 12.6Missense obs/exp: 162 / 134.0Syn Z: -1.39
DN
0.6745th %ile
GOF
0.73top 25%
LOF
0.3940th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

24 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic12
Likely Pathogenic2
VUS7
Likely Benign2
Benign1
12
Pathogenic
2
Likely Pathogenic
7
VUS
2
Likely Benign
1
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories· variant type breakdown unavailable

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
12
Likely Pathogenic
2
VUS
7
Likely Benign
2
Benign
1
Total24

Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

STPG4 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Open Research Assistant →
Recent Gene-Specific Literature
Gene in title · MEDLINE · newest first
Europe PMC

No open access results found