STATH

Chr 4

statherin

Also known as: STR

Predicted to enable extracellular matrix constituent, lubricant activity and hydroxyapatite binding activity. Predicted to be a structural constituent of tooth enamel. Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of bone mineralization; ossification; and saliva secretion. Predicted to be located in extracellular region. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

ResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.81
Clinical SummarySTATH
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
10 VUS of 12 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

omim: Error: OMIM fetch failed: 429

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.81LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score -0.10
OE 1.04 (0.561.81)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
-0.31Z-score
OE missense 1.15 (0.891.51)
38 obs / 33.1 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?1.04 (0.561.81)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.15 (0.891.51)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.63
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 6 / 5.7Missense obs/exp: 38 / 33.1Syn Z: -1.65

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.87top 5%
GOF
0.6344th %ile
LOF
0.10100th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

12 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS10
Likely Benign1
Benign1
10
VUS
1
Likely Benign
1
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
10
0
0
10
Likely Benign
0
1
0
0
1
Benign
0
0
1
0
1
Total0111012

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

22 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 33) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap STATH — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

STATH · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →