SNCAIP

Chr 5

synuclein alpha interacting protein

Also known as: SYPH1, Sph1

This gene encodes a protein containing several protein-protein interaction domains, including ankyrin-like repeats, a coiled-coil domain, and an ATP/GTP-binding motif. The encoded protein interacts with alpha-synuclein in neuronal tissue and may play a role in the formation of cytoplasmic inclusions and neurodegeneration. A mutation in this gene has been associated with Parkinson's disease. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.55
Clinical SummarySNCAIP
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.35) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
142 VUS of 205 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?
0.55LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 3.70
OE 0.35 (0.230.55)
Moderately constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?
0.77Z-score
OE missense 0.90 (0.830.98)
438 obs / 485.5 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.35 (0.230.55)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.90 (0.830.98)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.98
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 13 / 37.4Missense obs/exp: 438 / 485.5Syn Z: 0.25

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6259th %ile
GOF
0.6444th %ile
LOF
0.50top 25%

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

205 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS142
Likely Benign33
Benign12
Conflicting2
142
VUS
33
Likely Benign
12
Benign
2
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
1
115
16
10
142
Likely Benign
0
13
4
16
33
Benign
0
3
2
7
12
Conflicting
2
Total11312233189

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

21 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 33) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap SNCAIP — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

SNCAIP · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →