SNAP29

Chr 22

synaptosome associated protein 29

Also known as: CEDNIK, SNAP-29

This gene, a member of the SNAP25 gene family, encodes a protein involved in multiple membrane trafficking steps. Two other members of this gene family, SNAP23 and SNAP25, encode proteins that bind a syntaxin protein and mediate synaptic vesicle membrane docking and fusion to the plasma membrane. The protein encoded by this gene binds tightly to multiple syntaxins and is localized to intracellular membrane structures rather than to the plasma membrane. While the protein is mostly membrane-bound, a significant fraction of it is found free in the cytoplasm. Use of multiple polyadenylation sites has been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Primary Disease Associations & Inheritance

UniProtCerebral dysgenesis, neuropathy, ichthyosis, and palmoplantar keratoderma syndrome
596
ClinVar variants
283
Pathogenic / LP
0.01
pLI score
0
Active trials
Clinical SummarySNAP29
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.01) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
283 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 180 VUS of 596 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

omim: Error: OMIM fetch failed: 429

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.86LOEUF
pLI 0.014
Z-score 1.91
OE 0.41 (0.210.86)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
-0.87Z-score
OE missense 1.20 (1.061.36)
178 obs / 148.1 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.41 (0.210.86)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.1.20 (1.061.36)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.74
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 12.2Missense obs/exp: 178 / 148.1Syn Z: 1.52

ClinVar Variant Classifications

596 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic240
Likely Pathogenic43
VUS180
Likely Benign116
Benign11
Conflicting6
240
Pathogenic
43
Likely Pathogenic
180
VUS
116
Likely Benign
11
Benign
6
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
5
0
235
0
240
Likely Pathogenic
6
2
35
0
43
VUS
0
82
98
0
180
Likely Benign
0
3
47
66
116
Benign
0
0
10
1
11
Conflicting
6
Total118742567596

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

SNAP29 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Gene2Phenotype Curations

SNAP29-related cerebral dysgenesis, neuropathy, ichthyosis, and palmoplantar keratoderma syndrome (CEDNIK syndrome)

strong
ARLoss Of FunctionAbsent Gene Product
Dev. DisordersSkin
G2P ↗

Gene2Phenotype curations · DECIPHER consortium patient cohort (public variants) · deciphergenomics.org

OMIM — Genotype-Phenotype

No OMIM entries found.

Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Key Publications
Landmark & review papers · by relevance
PubMed
CEDNIK syndrome with phenotypic variability.
Nanda A et al.·Pediatr Dermatol
2022
Top 10 resultsSearch PubMed ↗

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →