SLC38A10

Chr 17

solute carrier family 38 member 10

Also known as: PP1744, SNAT10

Predicted to enable L-amino acid transmembrane transporter activity. Predicted to be involved in amino acid transmembrane transport. Predicted to act upstream of or within bone development. Located in Golgi apparatus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

0
Active trials
18
Pathogenic / LP
159
ClinVar variants
3
Pubs (1 yr)
0.6
Missense Z
0.86
LOEUF
Clinical SummarySLC38A10
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
18 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 119 VUS of 159 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.86LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.20
OE 0.60 (0.420.86)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.57Z-score
OE missense 0.94 (0.881.00)
679 obs / 721.8 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.60 (0.420.86)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.94 (0.881.00)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.03
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 21 / 35.0Missense obs/exp: 679 / 721.8Syn Z: -0.37
DN
0.6453th %ile
GOF
0.6639th %ile
LOF
0.3259th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

159 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic16
Likely Pathogenic2
VUS119
Likely Benign20
Benign2
16
Pathogenic
2
Likely Pathogenic
119
VUS
20
Likely Benign
2
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
16
0
16
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
2
0
2
VUS
0
118
1
0
119
Likely Benign
0
16
1
3
20
Benign
0
0
1
1
2
Total0134214159

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

SLC38A10 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence