RIMS3

Chr 1

regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 3

Also known as: NIM3, RIM 3, RIM3

Predicted to enable transmembrane transporter binding activity. Predicted to be a structural constituent of presynaptic active zone. Predicted to be involved in several processes, including regulated exocytosis; regulation of synapse organization; and regulation of synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Predicted to be located in presynaptic active zone. Predicted to be active in several cellular components, including postsynaptic cytosol; presynaptic active zone cytoplasmic component; and presynaptic membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.06
Clinical SummaryRIMS3
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
55 VUS of 74 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.06LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.41
OE 0.59 (0.341.06)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.97Z-score
OE missense 0.81 (0.710.92)
162 obs / 200.8 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.59 (0.341.06)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.81 (0.710.92)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.83
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 8 / 13.6Missense obs/exp: 162 / 200.8Syn Z: 1.20

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.75top 25%
GOF
0.7127th %ile
LOF
0.4627th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

74 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS55
Likely Benign8
Benign5
55
VUS
8
Likely Benign
5
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
55
0
0
55
Likely Benign
0
3
1
4
8
Benign
0
2
1
2
5
Total0602668

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

9 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 16) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap RIMS3 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

RIMS3 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →