REXO4

Chr 9

RNA exonuclease 4

Also known as: REX4, XPMC2, XPMC2H

Enables DNA binding activity and nuclease activity. Involved in DNA catabolic process and DNA repair. Located in nuclear speck and nucleolus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

0
Active trials
10
Pathogenic / LP
90
ClinVar variants
4
Pubs (1 yr)
0.1
Missense Z
1.09
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryREXO4
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
10 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 74 VUS of 90 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
1.09LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.29
OE 0.67 (0.431.09)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.11Z-score
OE missense 0.98 (0.881.09)
246 obs / 250.8 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.67 (0.431.09)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.98 (0.881.09)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.86
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 12 / 17.9Missense obs/exp: 246 / 250.8Syn Z: 1.11
DN
0.6551th %ile
GOF
0.4480th %ile
LOF
0.3745th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

90 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic10
VUS74
Likely Benign6
10
Pathogenic
74
VUS
6
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
10
0
10
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
66
8
0
74
Likely Benign
0
5
0
1
6
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total07118190

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

REXO4 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Key Publications
Landmark & review papers · by relevance
PubMed
Top 2 results · since 2015Search PubMed ↗