RAB5C

Chr 17

RAB5C, member RAS oncogene family

Also known as: L1880, RAB5CL, RAB5L, RABL

Members of the Rab protein family are small GTPases of the Ras superfamily that are thought to ensure fidelity in the process of docking and/or fusion of vesicles with their correct acceptor compartment (Han et al., 1996 [PubMed 8646882]).[supplied by OMIM, Nov 2010]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
DNmechanismLOEUF 0.36
Clinical SummaryRAB5C
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Highly constrained gene — heterozygous loss-of-function variants are very rare in the population (pLI 0.94). One damaged copy is likely sufficient to cause disease.
📋
ClinVar Variants
1 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 26 VUS of 44 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

LoF intolerant — likely haploinsufficient
LoF Constraint?
0.36LOEUF
pLI 0.937
Z-score 3.11
OE 0.08 (0.030.36)
Highly constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?
1.42Z-score
OE missense 0.67 (0.570.79)
98 obs / 146.2 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.08 (0.030.36)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.67 (0.570.79)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.96
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 1 / 13.2Missense obs/exp: 98 / 146.2Syn Z: 0.25
Curated Mechanism (G2P)Gene2Phenotype (DDG2P) ↗
moderateRAB5C-related neurodevelopmental disorderDNAD

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6840th %ile
GOF
0.5955th %ile
LOF
0.54top 25%

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and loss-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
LOFLOEUF 0.36

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312. Mechanism ranking also informed by gnomAD constraint, ClinVar, and ClinGen data.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

44 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Likely Pathogenic1
VUS26
Benign1
Conflicting1
1
Likely Pathogenic
26
VUS
1
Benign
1
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
1
0
0
1
VUS
3
23
0
0
26
Likely Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Benign
0
0
0
1
1
Conflicting
1
Total3240129

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

6 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 7) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap RAB5C — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

RAB5C · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →