PYCARD

Chr 16

PYD and CARD domain containing

Also known as: ASC, CARD5, TMS, TMS-1, TMS1

This gene encodes an adaptor protein that is composed of two protein-protein interaction domains: a N-terminal PYRIN-PAAD-DAPIN domain (PYD) and a C-terminal caspase-recruitment domain (CARD). The PYD and CARD domains are members of the six-helix bundle death domain-fold superfamily that mediates assembly of large signaling complexes in the inflammatory and apoptotic signaling pathways via the activation of caspase. In normal cells, this protein is localized to the cytoplasm; however, in cells undergoing apoptosis, it forms ball-like aggregates near the nuclear periphery. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.90
Clinical SummaryPYCARD
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
13 VUS of 22 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
1 active or recruiting trial — potential therapeutic options may be available

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.90LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score -0.44
OE 1.24 (0.611.90)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.40Z-score
OE missense 0.89 (0.761.05)
103 obs / 115.2 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?1.24 (0.611.90)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.89 (0.761.05)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.13
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 4.0Missense obs/exp: 103 / 115.2Syn Z: -0.74

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7326th %ile
GOF
0.76top 25%
LOF
0.1697th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

22 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS13
Likely Benign1
Benign1
13
VUS
1
Likely Benign
1
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
13
0
0
13
Likely Benign
0
0
0
1
1
Benign
0
0
0
1
1
Total0130215

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

10 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 17) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap PYCARD — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

PYCARD · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.