PRSS21

Chr 16

serine protease 21

Also known as: ESP-1, ESP1, TEST1, TESTISIN

This gene encodes a cell-surface anchored serine protease, which is a member of the trypsin family of serine proteases. The encoded protein is predicted to be active on peptide linkages involving the carboxyl group of lysine or arginine. The encoded protein localizes to the cytoplasm and the plasma membrane of premeiotic testicular germ cells and may be involved in progression of testicular tumors of germ cell origin. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2012]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.32
Clinical SummaryPRSS21
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
54 VUS of 67 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.32LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.66
OE 0.81 (0.521.32)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
-0.64Z-score
OE missense 1.13 (1.011.26)
224 obs / 198.5 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.81 (0.521.32)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.13 (1.011.26)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.93
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 12 / 14.7Missense obs/exp: 224 / 198.5Syn Z: 0.48

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6939th %ile
GOF
0.6931th %ile
LOF
0.3065th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

67 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS54
Likely Benign6
54
VUS
6
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
54
0
0
54
Likely Benign
0
6
0
0
6
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total0600060

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

32 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 46) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap PRSS21 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

PRSS21 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →