OR1E1

Chr 17

olfactory receptor family 1 subfamily E member 1

Also known as: HGM071, OR13-66, OR17-2, OR17-32, OR1E5, OR1E6, OR1E8P, OR1E9P

Olfactory receptors interact with odorant molecules in the nose, to initiate a neuronal response that triggers the perception of a smell. The olfactory receptor proteins are members of a large family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) arising from single coding-exon genes. Olfactory receptors share a 7-transmembrane domain structure with many neurotransmitter and hormone receptors and are responsible for the recognition and G protein-mediated transduction of odorant signals. The olfactory receptor gene family is the largest in the genome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.48
Clinical SummaryOR1E1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
37 VUS of 40 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.48LOEUF
pLI 0.001
Z-score 0.69
OE 0.72 (0.371.48)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.40Z-score
OE missense 0.91 (0.801.04)
151 obs / 165.5 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.72 (0.371.48)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.91 (0.801.04)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.01
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 7.0Missense obs/exp: 151 / 165.5Syn Z: -0.05

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.89top 5%
GOF
0.84top 5%
LOF
0.1299th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

40 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS37
Likely Benign3
37
VUS
3
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
37
0
0
37
Likely Benign
0
3
0
0
3
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total0400040

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

41 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 57) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap OR1E1 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

OR1E1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →