NIPSNAP3B

Chr 9

nipsnap homolog 3B

Also known as: FP944, NIPSNAP3, SNAP1

NIPSNAP3B belongs to a family of proteins with putative roles in vesicular trafficking (Buechler et al., 2004 [PubMed 15177564]).[supplied by OMIM, Mar 2008]

0
Active trials
45
Pathogenic / LP
366
ClinVar variants
4
Pubs (1 yr)
0.3
Missense Z
1.61
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryNIPSNAP3B
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
45 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 149 VUS of 366 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
1.61LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score -0.14
OE 1.04 (0.691.61)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.28Z-score
OE missense 0.93 (0.811.08)
130 obs / 139.2 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.1.04 (0.691.61)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.93 (0.811.08)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.0.98
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 14 / 13.5Missense obs/exp: 130 / 139.2Syn Z: 0.13
DN
0.6452th %ile
GOF
0.5367th %ile
LOF
0.3551th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

366 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic38
Likely Pathogenic7
VUS149
Likely Benign107
Benign35
Conflicting30
38
Pathogenic
7
Likely Pathogenic
149
VUS
107
Likely Benign
35
Benign
30
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
1
1
36
0
38
Likely Pathogenic
1
4
2
0
7
VUS
1
91
56
1
149
Likely Benign
0
11
25
71
107
Benign
0
0
33
2
35
Conflicting
30
Total310715274366

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

NIPSNAP3B · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Recent Gene-Specific Literature
Gene in title · MEDLINE · newest first
Europe PMC