NHERF2

Chr 16AD

NHERF family PDZ scaffold protein 2

Also known as: E3KARP, NHE3RF2, NHERF-2, OCTS2, SIP-1, SIP1, SLC9A3R2, TKA-1

This gene encodes a member of the NHERF family of PDZ scaffolding proteins. These proteins mediate many cellular processes by binding to and regulating the membrane expression and protein-protein interactions of membrane receptors and transport proteins. The encoded protein plays a role in intestinal sodium absorption by regulating the activity of the sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3, and may also regulate the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) ion channel. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2011]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismADLOEUF 0.702 OMIM phenotypes
Clinical SummaryNHERF2
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.33) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
1 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 90 VUS of 104 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.70LOEUF
pLI 0.038
Z-score 2.39
OE 0.33 (0.170.70)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
-0.17Z-score
OE missense 1.03 (0.921.16)
209 obs / 202.1 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.33 (0.170.70)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.03 (0.921.16)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.13
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 5 / 15.0Missense obs/exp: 209 / 202.1Syn Z: -0.95

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6841th %ile
GOF
0.81top 10%
LOF
0.3259th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

104 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic1
VUS90
Likely Benign6
Benign2
1
Pathogenic
90
VUS
6
Likely Benign
2
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
1
0
1
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
88
0
2
90
Likely Benign
0
4
1
1
6
Benign
0
2
0
0
2
Total0942399

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

44 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 62) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap NHERF2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

NHERF2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →