ITGAM

Chr 16

integrin subunit alpha M

Also known as: CD11B, CR3A, HNA-4, MAC-1, MAC1A, MO1A, SLEB6

This gene encodes the integrin alpha M chain. Integrins are heterodimeric integral membrane proteins composed of an alpha chain and a beta chain. This I-domain containing alpha integrin combines with the beta 2 chain (ITGB2) to form a leukocyte-specific integrin referred to as macrophage receptor 1 ('Mac-1'), or inactivated-C3b (iC3b) receptor 3 ('CR3'). The alpha M beta 2 integrin is important in the adherence of neutrophils and monocytes to stimulated endothelium, and also in the phagocytosis of complement coated particles. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.64
Clinical SummaryITGAM
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
637 VUS of 1132 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.64LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 3.87
OE 0.46 (0.340.64)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
1.42Z-score
OE missense 0.85 (0.790.91)
582 obs / 686.9 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.46 (0.340.64)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.85 (0.790.91)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.92
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 28 / 60.5Missense obs/exp: 582 / 686.9Syn Z: 1.04

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7327th %ile
GOF
0.6931th %ile
LOF
0.2679th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

1132 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS637
Likely Benign438
Benign30
Conflicting7
637
VUS
438
Likely Benign
30
Benign
7
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
42
531
55
9
637
Likely Benign
0
7
206
225
438
Benign
0
10
11
9
30
Conflicting
7
Total425482722431,112

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

10 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 18) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap ITGAM — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ITGAM · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →