ITGAD

Chr 16

integrin subunit alpha D

Also known as: ADB2, CD11D

This gene belongs to the beta-2 integrin family of membrane glycoproteins, which are are composed of non-covalently linked alpha and beta subunits to form a heterodimer. It encodes the alpha subunit of the cell surface heterodimers and is involved in the activation and adhesion functions of leukocytes. The gene is located about 11kb downstream of the integrin subunit alpha X gene, another member of the integrin family. It is expressed in the tissue and circulating myeloid leukocytes. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2015]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.87
Clinical SummaryITGAD
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
175 VUS of 196 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.87LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.44
OE 0.67 (0.530.87)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.85Z-score
OE missense 0.91 (0.850.97)
628 obs / 690.9 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.67 (0.530.87)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.91 (0.850.97)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.08
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 43 / 64.0Missense obs/exp: 628 / 690.9Syn Z: -1.02

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6939th %ile
GOF
0.7029th %ile
LOF
0.2679th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

196 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS175
Likely Benign12
175
VUS
12
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
175
0
0
175
Likely Benign
0
11
0
1
12
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total018601187

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

9 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 16) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap ITGAD — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ITGAD · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →