GSX2

Chr 4AR

GS homeobox 2

Also known as: DMJDS2, GSH2

Enables DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specific and sequence-specific double-stranded DNA binding activity. Predicted to be involved in generation of neurons; olfactory bulb development; and regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Predicted to act upstream of or within several processes, including nervous system development; positive regulation of Notch signaling pathway; and positive regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiation. Located in cytoplasm and nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismARLOEUF 0.831 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryGSX2
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
diencephalic-mesencephalic junction dysplasia syndrome 2 · ARModerate

Moderate evidence — consider for supplementary testing

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.26) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
37 VUS of 50 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.83LOEUF
pLI 0.257
Z-score 1.89
OE 0.26 (0.110.83)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.59Z-score
OE missense 0.87 (0.761.00)
143 obs / 164.3 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.26 (0.110.83)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.87 (0.761.00)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.02
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 2 / 7.6Missense obs/exp: 143 / 164.3Syn Z: -0.16

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6551th %ile
GOF
0.4183th %ile
LOF
0.69top 10%

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (loss-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to loss-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

LOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

50 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS37
Likely Benign6
Benign7
37
VUS
6
Likely Benign
7
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
37
0
0
37
Likely Benign
0
2
0
4
6
Benign
0
1
4
2
7
Total0404650

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

17 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 20) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap GSX2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

GSX2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →