GRM1

Chr 6ADAR

glutamate metabotropic receptor 1

G-protein coupled receptor for glutamate. Ligand binding causes a conformation change that triggers signaling via guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) and modulates the activity of down-stream effectors. Signaling activates a phosphatidylinositol-calcium second messenger system. May participate in the central action of glutamate in the CNS, such as long-term potentiation in the hippocampus and long-term depression in the cerebellum (PubMed:24603153, PubMed:28886343, PubMed:7476890). May function in the light response in the retina (By similarity). Induces GRID1 and GRID2 cation-channel activation via GNAQ-PLC-PKC pathway in dopaminergic neurons and cerebellar Purkinje cell, respectively (PubMed:24357660, PubMed:27276689)

Primary Disease Associations & Inheritance

Spinocerebellar ataxia 44MIM #617691
AD
Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive 13MIM #614831
AR
460
ClinVar variants
28
Pathogenic / LP
0.14
pLI score
0
Active trials
Clinical SummaryGRM1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.24) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
28 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 227 VUS of 460 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.41LOEUF
pLI 0.143
Z-score 4.47
OE 0.24 (0.150.41)
Moderately constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
2.58Z-score
OE missense 0.72 (0.670.77)
475 obs / 661.9 exp
Mild constraint

Moderately missense-constrained (top ~2.5%)

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.24 (0.150.41)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.72 (0.670.77)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.22
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 10 / 40.9Missense obs/exp: 475 / 661.9Syn Z: -2.83

ClinVar Variant Classifications

460 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic22
Likely Pathogenic6
VUS227
Likely Benign139
Benign48
Conflicting9
22
Pathogenic
6
Likely Pathogenic
227
VUS
139
Likely Benign
48
Benign
9
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
3
3
16
0
22
Likely Pathogenic
4
1
1
0
6
VUS
2
198
19
8
227
Likely Benign
0
13
24
102
139
Benign
0
1
31
16
48
Conflicting
9
Total921691126451

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

GRM1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Gene2Phenotype Curations

GRM1-related congenital cerebellar ataxia

strong
ARLoss Of FunctionAbsent Gene Product
Dev. Disorders
G2P ↗

Gene2Phenotype curations · DECIPHER consortium patient cohort (public variants) · deciphergenomics.org

OMIM — Genotype-Phenotype Relationships

1 OMIM entry

Spinocerebellar ataxia 44

MIM #617691

Molecular basis of disorder known

Autosomal dominant

Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive 13

MIM #614831

Molecular basis of disorder known

Autosomal recessive
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →