GRIN2C

Chr 17

glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2C

Also known as: GluN2C, NMDAR2C, NR2C

This gene encodes a subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which is a subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptor. NMDA receptors are found in the central nervous system, are permeable to cations and have an important role in physiological processes such as learning, memory, and synaptic development. The receptor is a tetramer of different subunits (typically heterodimer of subunit 1 with one or more of subunits 2A-D), forming a channel that is permeable to calcium, potassium, and sodium, and whose properties are determined by subunit composition. Alterations in the subunit composition of the receptor are associated with pathophysiological conditions such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, depression, and schizophrenia. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2013]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.71
Clinical SummaryGRIN2C
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
154 VUS of 194 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.71LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.89
OE 0.48 (0.330.71)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
1.61Z-score
OE missense 0.82 (0.760.88)
519 obs / 633.0 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.48 (0.330.71)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.82 (0.760.88)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.95
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 17 / 35.6Missense obs/exp: 519 / 633.0Syn Z: 0.69

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.74top 25%
GOF
0.75top 25%
LOF
0.3453th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

194 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS154
Likely Benign20
Benign6
Conflicting1
154
VUS
20
Likely Benign
6
Benign
1
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
1
153
0
0
154
Likely Benign
0
11
1
8
20
Benign
0
2
2
2
6
Conflicting
1
Total1166310181

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

13 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 13) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap GRIN2C — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

GRIN2C · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →