GATA5

Chr 20ADAR

GATA binding protein 5

Also known as: CHTD5, GATAS, bB379O24.1

The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor that contains two GATA-type zinc fingers. The encoded protein is known to bind to hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha (HNF-1alpha), and this interaction is essential for cooperative activation of the intestinal lactase-phlorizin hydrolase promoter. In other organisms, similar proteins may be involved in the establishment of cardiac smooth muscle cell diversity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismAD/ARLOEUF 0.631 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryGATA5
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.24) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
5 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 76 VUS of 142 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.63LOEUF
pLI 0.285
Z-score 2.46
OE 0.24 (0.110.63)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
1.07Z-score
OE missense 0.78 (0.680.89)
146 obs / 187.3 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.24 (0.110.63)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.78 (0.680.89)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.00
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 3 / 12.3Missense obs/exp: 146 / 187.3Syn Z: -0.03

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6164th %ile
GOF
0.3689th %ile
LOF
0.70top 10%

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (loss-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to loss-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

LOFprediction above median · 20% of P/LP variants are LoF
DN1 literature citation

Literature Evidence

DNThe expression of the mutant inhibited wild-type-induced activation of the ANF promoter, suggesting that the mutant functions in a dominant-negative manner.1

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312. Mechanism ranking also informed by gnomAD constraint, ClinVar, and ClinGen data.

References

  1. 1.PMID 22961344

ClinVar Variant Classifications

142 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic4
Likely Pathogenic1
VUS76
Likely Benign49
Benign4
Conflicting5
4
Pathogenic
1
Likely Pathogenic
76
VUS
49
Likely Benign
4
Benign
5
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
4
0
0
4
Likely Pathogenic
1
0
0
0
1
VUS
4
69
3
0
76
Likely Benign
0
5
17
27
49
Benign
0
0
0
4
4
Conflicting
5
Total5782031139

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

15 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 23) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap GATA5 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

GATA5 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →