FBP2

Chr 9AD

fructose-bisphosphatase 2

Also known as: CORLK

This gene encodes a gluconeogenesis regulatory enzyme which catalyzes the hydrolysis of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate to fructose 6-phosphate and inorganic phosphate. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismADLOEUF 0.991 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryFBP2
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
1 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 59 VUS of 73 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.99LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.59
OE 0.55 (0.320.99)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.19Z-score
OE missense 0.96 (0.861.08)
201 obs / 208.7 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.55 (0.320.99)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.96 (0.861.08)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.00
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 8 / 14.5Missense obs/exp: 201 / 208.7Syn Z: 0.03

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.76top 25%
GOF
0.6541th %ile
LOF
0.2775th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median · 1 literature citation
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Literature Evidence

DNExome sequencing did not-identify any mutations in known leukodystrophy genes but revealed a heterozygous variant in the FBP2 gene, c.343G>A, p. Biochemical analysis showed that the variant has a dominant negative effect on enzymatic activity, substrate affinity, cooperativity and thermal stability.1

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

References

  1. 1.PMID 33977262

ClinVar Variant Classifications

73 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic1
VUS59
Likely Benign2
Benign5
1
Pathogenic
59
VUS
2
Likely Benign
5
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
1
0
1
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
59
0
0
59
Likely Benign
0
1
0
1
2
Benign
1
3
0
1
5
Total1631267

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

33 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 38) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap FBP2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

FBP2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →