EXOSC3

Chr 9AR

exosome component 3

Also known as: CGI-102, PCH1B, RRP40, Rrp40p, bA3J10.7, hRrp-40, p10

This gene encodes a non-catalytic component of the human exosome, a complex with 3'-5' exoribonuclease activity that plays a role in numerous RNA processing and degradation activities. Related pseudogenes of this gene are found on chromosome 19 and 21. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2012]

Primary Disease Associations & Inheritance

Pontocerebellar hypoplasia, type 1BMIM #614678
AR
393
ClinVar variants
120
Pathogenic / LP
0.00
pLI score
0
Active trials
Clinical SummaryEXOSC3
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
120 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 114 VUS of 393 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
1.21LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.08
OE 0.65 (0.371.21)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
-0.22Z-score
OE missense 1.05 (0.921.20)
162 obs / 154.2 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.65 (0.371.21)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.1.05 (0.921.20)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.47
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 7 / 10.8Missense obs/exp: 162 / 154.2Syn Z: -2.84

ClinVar Variant Classifications

393 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic83
Likely Pathogenic37
VUS114
Likely Benign132
Benign13
Conflicting14
83
Pathogenic
37
Likely Pathogenic
114
VUS
132
Likely Benign
13
Benign
14
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
13
5
65
0
83
Likely Pathogenic
13
12
12
0
37
VUS
4
88
22
0
114
Likely Benign
0
5
32
95
132
Benign
0
1
9
3
13
Conflicting
14
Total3011114098393

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

EXOSC3 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Gene2Phenotype Curations

EXOSC3-related pontocerebellar hypoplasia

definitive
ARUndeterminedAbsent Gene Product
Dev. Disorders
G2P ↗
missense variantinframe deletioninframe insertion

Gene2Phenotype curations · DECIPHER consortium patient cohort (public variants) · deciphergenomics.org

OMIM — Genotype-Phenotype Relationships

1 OMIM entry

Pontocerebellar hypoplasia, type 1B

MIM #614678

Molecular basis of disorder known

Autosomal recessive
📖
GeneReview available — EXOSC3
Authoritative clinical overview · NCBI Bookshelf · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence
Key Publications
Landmark & review papers · by relevance
PubMed
A Chemical Biology Approach to Model Pontocerebellar Hypoplasia Type 1B (PCH1B).
François-Moutal L et al.·ACS Chem Biol
2018Functional
Top 10 resultsSearch PubMed ↗

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →