ERMAP

Chr 1

erythroblast membrane associated protein (Scianna blood group)

Also known as: BTN5, PRO2801, RD, SC

The protein encoded by this gene is a cell surface transmembrane protein that may act as an erythroid cell receptor, possibly as a mediator of cell adhesion. Polymorphisms in this gene are responsible for the Scianna/Radin blood group system. Two transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 1.172 OMIM phenotypes
Clinical SummaryERMAP
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
1 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 59 VUS of 86 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.17LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 0.96
OE 0.78 (0.531.17)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.71Z-score
OE missense 0.88 (0.790.98)
234 obs / 266.4 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.78 (0.531.17)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.88 (0.790.98)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.97
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 17 / 21.9Missense obs/exp: 234 / 266.4Syn Z: 0.23

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.7325th %ile
GOF
0.72top 25%
LOF
0.2679th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

86 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic1
VUS59
Likely Benign7
Benign6
1
Pathogenic
59
VUS
7
Likely Benign
6
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
1
0
0
0
1
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
59
0
0
59
Likely Benign
0
4
0
3
7
Benign
0
3
1
2
6
Total1661573

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

12 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 15) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap ERMAP — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ERMAP · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →