EPHA3

Chr 3

EPH receptor A3

Also known as: EK4, ETK, ETK1, HEK, HEK4, TYRO4

This gene belongs to the ephrin receptor subfamily of the protein-tyrosine kinase family. EPH and EPH-related receptors have been implicated in mediating developmental events, particularly in the nervous system. Receptors in the EPH subfamily typically have a single kinase domain and an extracellular region containing a Cys-rich domain and 2 fibronectin type III repeats. The ephrin receptors are divided into 2 groups based on the similarity of their extracellular domain sequences and their affinities for binding ephrin-A and ephrin-B ligands. This gene encodes a protein that binds ephrin-A ligands. Two alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.53
Clinical SummaryEPHA3
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
82 VUS of 106 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?
0.53LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 4.25
OE 0.36 (0.240.53)
Moderately constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?
0.65Z-score
OE missense 0.92 (0.860.99)
503 obs / 545.9 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.36 (0.240.53)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.92 (0.860.99)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.08
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 18 / 50.6Missense obs/exp: 503 / 545.9Syn Z: -0.94

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.76top 25%
GOF
0.76top 25%
LOF
0.2777th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (gain-of-function and dominant-negative). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to gain-of-function as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

GOFprediction above median
DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

106 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS82
Likely Benign11
Benign6
82
VUS
11
Likely Benign
6
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
82
0
0
82
Likely Benign
0
4
1
6
11
Benign
0
1
0
5
6
Total08711199

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

8 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 15) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap EPHA3 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

EPHA3 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →