ELMO3

Chr 16

engulfment and cell motility 3

Also known as: CED-12, CED12, ELMO-3

The protein encoded by this gene is similar to a C. elegans protein that functions in phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and in cell migration. Other members of this small family of engulfment and cell motility (ELMO) proteins have been shown to interact with the dedicator of cyto-kinesis 1 protein to promote phagocytosis and effect cell shape changes. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

0
Active trials
24
Pathogenic / LP
175
ClinVar variants
0
Pubs (1 yr)
0.2
Missense Z
0.97
LOEUF
Clinical SummaryELMO3
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
24 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 142 VUS of 175 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

pubtator: TimeoutError: The operation was aborted due to timeout

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.97LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 1.71
OE 0.72 (0.530.97)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
0.16Z-score
OE missense 0.98 (0.911.05)
495 obs / 505.2 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.72 (0.530.97)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.98 (0.911.05)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.07
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 30 / 41.9Missense obs/exp: 495 / 505.2Syn Z: -0.83
DN
0.5772th %ile
GOF
0.6640th %ile
LOF
0.3454th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is gain-of-function.

GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

175 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic23
Likely Pathogenic1
VUS142
Likely Benign8
Benign1
23
Pathogenic
1
Likely Pathogenic
142
VUS
8
Likely Benign
1
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
23
0
23
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
1
0
1
VUS
1
122
19
0
142
Likely Benign
0
5
2
1
8
Benign
0
1
0
0
1
Total1128451175

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

ELMO3 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →
Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence