EIF3F

Chr 11AR

eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit F

Also known as: EIF3S5, MRT67, eIF3-p47

Enables identical protein binding activity and metal-dependent deubiquitinase activity. Contributes to translation initiation factor activity. Involved in IRES-dependent viral translational initiation and translational initiation. Located in membrane. Part of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 complex. Implicated in autosomal recessive intellectual developmental disorder 67. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
LOFmechanismARLOEUF 0.311 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryEIF3F
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
syndromic intellectual disability · ARDefinitive

Definitive — sufficient evidence for diagnostic panels

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Highly constrained gene — heterozygous loss-of-function variants are very rare in the population (pLI 0.97). One damaged copy is likely sufficient to cause disease.
📋
ClinVar Variants
4 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 52 VUS of 96 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
1 active or recruiting trial — potential therapeutic options may be available

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

LoF intolerant — likely haploinsufficient
LoF Constraint?
0.31LOEUF
pLI 0.970
Z-score 3.39
OE 0.07 (0.020.31)
Highly constrained

Highly LoF-intolerant (top ~10% of genes)

Missense Constraint?
-0.11Z-score
OE missense 1.02 (0.911.14)
212 obs / 207.6 exp
Tolerant

Tolerant to missense variation

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.07 (0.020.31)
00.351.4
Missense OE?1.02 (0.911.14)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.31
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 1 / 15.3Missense obs/exp: 212 / 207.6Syn Z: -2.24
Curated Mechanism (G2P)Gene2Phenotype (DDG2P) ↗
strongEIF3F-related developmental disorderLOFAR

This gene — mechanism propensity

Predictions shown for reference only — model trained on dominant genes, not applicable to AR conditions.

DN
0.4488th %ile
GOF
0.4875th %ile
LOF
0.65top 25%

The Badonyi & Marsh prediction model was trained exclusively on dominant disease genes. Predictions are not reliable for genes with autosomal recessive inheritance and are shown at reduced opacity for reference only.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312. Mechanism ranking also informed by gnomAD constraint, ClinVar, and ClinGen data.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

96 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic1
Likely Pathogenic3
VUS52
Likely Benign21
Benign8
1
Pathogenic
3
Likely Pathogenic
52
VUS
21
Likely Benign
8
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
1
0
0
0
1
Likely Pathogenic
1
2
0
0
3
VUS
1
48
2
1
52
Likely Benign
0
4
1
16
21
Benign
0
4
2
2
8
Total35851985

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

16 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 21) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap EIF3F — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

EIF3F · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.