EIF2AK1

Chr 7AD

eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 1

Also known as: HCR, HRI, hHRI

The protein encoded by this gene acts at the level of translation initiation to downregulate protein synthesis in response to stress. The encoded protein is a kinase that can be inactivated by hemin. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismADLOEUF 0.711 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryEIF2AK1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
6 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 201 VUS of 356 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
0.71LOEUF
pLI 0.000
Z-score 2.89
OE 0.47 (0.320.71)
Tolerant

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
0.43Z-score
OE missense 0.93 (0.851.02)
312 obs / 334.4 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.47 (0.320.71)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.93 (0.851.02)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.08
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 16 / 34.2Missense obs/exp: 312 / 334.4Syn Z: -0.69
Curated Mechanism (G2P)Gene2Phenotype (DDG2P) ↗
limitedEIF2AK1-related neurodevelopmental syndromeOTHERAD

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.75top 25%
GOF
0.6443th %ile
LOF
0.3357th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

356 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic5
Likely Pathogenic1
VUS201
Likely Benign85
Benign19
Conflicting4
5
Pathogenic
1
Likely Pathogenic
201
VUS
85
Likely Benign
19
Benign
4
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
2
0
3
0
5
Likely Pathogenic
1
0
0
0
1
VUS
11
175
12
3
201
Likely Benign
1
5
28
51
85
Benign
0
5
9
5
19
Conflicting
4
Total151855259315

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

41 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 58) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap EIF2AK1 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

EIF2AK1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →