EHD2

Chr 19

EH domain containing 2

Also known as: PAST2

This gene encodes a member of the EH domain-containing protein family. These proteins are characterized by a C-terminal EF-hand domain, a nucleotide-binding consensus site at the N terminus and a bipartite nuclear localization signal. The encoded protein interacts with the actin cytoskeleton through an N-terminal domain and also binds to an EH domain-binding protein through the C-terminal EH domain. This interaction appears to connect clathrin-dependent endocytosis to actin, suggesting that this gene product participates in the endocytic pathway. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
MultiplemechanismLOEUF 0.54
Clinical SummaryEHD2
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.23) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
84 VUS of 93 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?
0.54LOEUF
pLI 0.308
Z-score 2.92
OE 0.23 (0.120.54)
Moderately constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?
1.88Z-score
OE missense 0.73 (0.660.80)
269 obs / 371.0 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.23 (0.120.54)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.73 (0.660.80)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.95
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 4 / 17.0Missense obs/exp: 269 / 371.0Syn Z: 0.50

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6744th %ile
GOF
0.6639th %ile
LOF
0.3260th %ile

This gene has evidence for multiple mechanisms of pathogenicity (dominant-negative and gain-of-function). Both the Badonyi & Marsh prediction and the broader genomic evidence point to dominant-negative as the predominant mechanism. Different variants in this gene may act through different mechanisms — interpret in context of the specific variant.

DNprediction above median
GOFprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

93 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

VUS84
Likely Benign1
84
VUS
1
Likely Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
VUS
0
84
0
0
84
Likely Benign
0
0
0
1
1
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total0840185

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

13 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 22) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap EHD2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

EHD2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →