EGR2

Chr 10ADAR

early growth response 2

Also known as: AT591, CMT1D, CMT4E, KROX20

The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor with three tandem C2H2-type zinc fingers. Defects in this gene are associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1D (CMT1D), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4E (CMT4E), and with Dejerine-Sottas syndrome (DSS). Multiple transcript variants encoding two different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

GeneReviewsOMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
LOFmechanismAD/ARLOEUF 0.603 OMIM phenotypes
Clinical SummaryEGR2
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease · SDDefinitive

Definitive — sufficient evidence for diagnostic panels

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Moderately constrained gene (pLI 0.50) — some intolerance to loss-of-function variants.
📋
ClinVar Variants
19 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 274 VUS of 466 total submissions
💊
Clinical Trials
1 active or recruiting trial — potential therapeutic options may be available
📖
GeneReview available — EGR2
Authoritative clinical overview · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?
0.60LOEUF
pLI 0.503
Z-score 2.42
OE 0.19 (0.080.60)
Moderately constrained

Typical tolerance to LoF variation

Missense Constraint?
2.44Z-score
OE missense 0.60 (0.530.68)
175 obs / 292.6 exp
Mild constraint

Moderately missense-constrained (top ~2.5%)

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.19 (0.080.60)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.60 (0.530.68)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.07
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 2 / 10.4Missense obs/exp: 175 / 292.6Syn Z: -0.58
Curated Mechanism (G2P)Gene2Phenotype (DDG2P) ↗
definitiveEGR2-related neuropathy, congenital hypomyelinatingLOFAR

This gene — mechanism propensity

Predictions shown for reference only — model trained on dominant genes, not applicable to AR conditions.

DN
0.5575th %ile
GOF
0.3986th %ile
LOF
0.76top 10%

The Badonyi & Marsh prediction model was trained exclusively on dominant disease genes. Predictions are not reliable for genes with autosomal recessive inheritance and are shown at reduced opacity for reference only.

Literature Evidence

DNWe also contrast morphological studies in the context of the I268N homozygous recessive mutation affecting the NAB repressor binding site and the R359W dominant-negative mutation in the zinc-finger domain.1

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

References

  1. 1.PMID 17717711

ClinVar Variant Classifications

466 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic13
Likely Pathogenic6
VUS274
Likely Benign138
Benign15
Conflicting18
13
Pathogenic
6
Likely Pathogenic
274
VUS
138
Likely Benign
15
Benign
18
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
13
0
0
13
Likely Pathogenic
0
6
0
0
6
VUS
11
249
14
0
274
Likely Benign
0
3
16
119
138
Benign
0
0
14
1
15
Conflicting
18
Total1127144120464

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

15 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 22) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap EGR2 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

EGR2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.