DNAJC19

Chr 3AR

DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C19

Also known as: PAM18, TIM14, TIMM14

The protein encoded by this gene is thought to be part of a complex involved in the ATP-dependent transport of transit peptide-containing proteins from the inner cell membrane to the mitochondrial matrix. Defects in this gene are a cause of 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 5 (MGA5), also known as dilated cardiomyopathy with ataxia (DCMA). Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Related pseudogenes have been identified on chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 14 and 19. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2012]

GeneReviewsOMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
DNmechanismARLOEUF 1.311 OMIM phenotype
Clinical SummaryDNAJC19
🧬
Gene-Disease Validity (ClinGen)
3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 5 · ARDefinitive

Definitive — sufficient evidence for diagnostic panels

Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Low constraint (pLI 0.00) — loss-of-function variants are relatively tolerated in the population.
📋
ClinVar Variants
24 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 54 VUS of 176 total submissions
📖
GeneReview available — DNAJC19
Authoritative clinical overview · Recommended first read
Open GeneReview ↗

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Tolerant — LoF & missense variants common in population
LoF Constraint?
1.31LOEUF
pLI 0.001
Z-score 0.93
OE 0.66 (0.361.31)
Tolerant

Highly tolerant — LoF variants common in population

Missense Constraint?
0.88Z-score
OE missense 0.69 (0.540.89)
44 obs / 63.7 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.66 (0.361.31)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.69 (0.540.89)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?0.96
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 6 / 9.0Missense obs/exp: 44 / 63.7Syn Z: 0.15

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.80top 10%
GOF
0.5562th %ile
LOF
0.2677th %ile

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

176 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic14
Likely Pathogenic10
VUS54
Likely Benign76
Benign10
Conflicting5
14
Pathogenic
10
Likely Pathogenic
54
VUS
76
Likely Benign
10
Benign
5
Conflicting

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
11
0
3
0
14
Likely Pathogenic
9
1
0
0
10
VUS
6
43
5
0
54
Likely Benign
0
0
48
28
76
Benign
0
0
10
0
10
Conflicting
5
Total26446628169

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

30 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 31) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap DNAJC19 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

DNAJC19 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →