Enables sequence-specific double-stranded DNA binding activity. Predicted to be involved in regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II and sex differentiation. Predicted to act upstream of or within several processes, including nervous system development; positive regulation of neuroblast proliferation; and stem cell fate specification. Predicted to be located in chromatin. Predicted to be active in nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Jul 2025]

101
ClinVar variants
7
Pathogenic / LP
0.92
pLI score· haploinsufficient
0
Active trials
Clinical SummaryDMRTA2
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Highly constrained gene — heterozygous loss-of-function variants are very rare in the population (pLI 0.92). One damaged copy is likely sufficient to cause disease.
📋
ClinVar Variants
7 Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 89 VUS of 101 total submissions
Some data sources returned errors (1)

omim: Error: OMIM fetch failed: 429

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

LoF intolerant — likely haploinsufficient
LoF Constraint?LOEUF (Loss-of-function Observed/Expected Upper bound Fraction) is the upper bound of the 90% CI for LoF OE — the preferred gnomAD v4 metric. Lower = more intolerant to LoF. LOEUF < 0.35 = highly constrained.
0.38LOEUF
pLI 0.916
Z-score 2.61
OE 0.00 (0.000.38)
Highly constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?Missense Z-score: standard deviations fewer missense variants observed vs. expected. Z > 3.09 (p < 0.001) = gene does not tolerate missense variation. OE missense < 0.6 is also considered constrained.
1.40Z-score
OE missense 0.72 (0.630.83)
141 obs / 196.3 exp
Tolerant

Mild missense constraint

Observed / Expected Ratios?Shaded band = 90% confidence interval. Vertical tick = point estimate. Grey threshold line = gnomAD constraint cutoff for that variant class.
LoF OE?Ratio of observed to expected LoF variants. Upper CI bound (LOEUF) ≤ 0.35 = strong LoF constraint signal.0.00 (0.000.38)
00.351.4
Missense OE?Ratio of observed to expected missense variants. OE ≤ 0.6 = fewer missense variants than expected by chance.0.72 (0.630.83)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?Control metric — synonymous variants are largely neutral and expected near OE = 1.0. Significant deviation may indicate annotation issues.1.15
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 0 / 8.0Missense obs/exp: 141 / 196.3Syn Z: -1.13

ClinVar Variant Classifications

101 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Pathogenic4
Likely Pathogenic3
VUS89
Likely Benign2
Benign3
4
Pathogenic
3
Likely Pathogenic
89
VUS
2
Likely Benign
3
Benign

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
4
0
4
Likely Pathogenic
0
0
3
0
3
VUS
0
85
4
0
89
Likely Benign
0
2
0
0
2
Benign
0
0
1
2
3
Total087122101

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

DMRTA2 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

OMIM — Genotype-Phenotype

No OMIM entries found.

Clinical Literature
Landmark / reviewRecent case evidence

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →