DMAP1

Chr 1

DNA methyltransferase 1 associated protein 1

Also known as: DNMAP1, DNMTAP1, EAF2, MEAF2, SWC4

This gene encodes a subunit of several, distinct complexes involved in the repression or activation of transcription. The encoded protein can independently repress transcription and is targeted to replication foci throughout S phase by interacting directly with the N-terminus of DNA methyltransferase 1. During late S phase, histone deacetylase 2 is added to this complex, providing a means to deacetylate histones in transcriptionally inactive heterochromatin following replication. The encoded protein is also a component of the nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4 complex and interacts with the transcriptional corepressor tumor susceptibility gene 101 and the pro-apoptotic death-associated protein 6, among others. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding the same protein have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OMIMResearchGenerating clinical summary…
DNmechanismLOEUF 0.55
Clinical SummaryDMAP1
Population Constraint (gnomAD)
Constrained for loss-of-function variants (OE-LoF 0.29) despite low pLI — interpret in context.
📋
ClinVar Variants
1 unique Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic· 59 VUS of 75 total submissions

Population Genetics & Constraint

gnomAD v4 — loss-of-function & missense intolerance

Moderate LoF intolerance
LoF Constraint?
0.55LOEUF
pLI 0.041
Z-score 3.22
OE 0.29 (0.170.55)
Moderately constrained

More LoF-intolerant than ~75% of genes

Missense Constraint?
2.29Z-score
OE missense 0.63 (0.550.71)
186 obs / 297.3 exp
Mild constraint

Moderately missense-constrained (top ~2.5%)

Observed / Expected Ratios?
LoF OE?0.29 (0.170.55)
00.351.4
Missense OE?0.63 (0.550.71)
00.61.4
Synonymous OE?1.01
01.21.6
LoF obs/exp: 7 / 24.0Missense obs/exp: 186 / 297.3Syn Z: -0.05

This gene — mechanism propensity

DN
0.6552th %ile
GOF
0.4776th %ile
LOF
0.52top 25%

The highest-scoring mechanism for this gene is dominant-negative.

DNprediction above median

Note: In-silico variant effect predictors (SIFT, PolyPhen, REVEL, CADD) may underestimate pathogenicity of missense variants in genes with GOF or DN mechanisms. Consider functional evidence and clinical context.

Predictions from Badonyi M, Marsh JA. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0307312.

ClinVar Variant Classifications

75 submitted variants in ClinVar

Classification Summary

Likely Pathogenic1
VUS59
1
Likely Pathogenic
59
VUS

Curated Variants Distribution

Classified variants from ClinVar · 5 ACMG categories

ClassificationLoFMissense + InframeNon-codingSynonymousTotal
Pathogenic
0
0
0
0
0
Likely Pathogenic
1
0
0
0
1
VUS
2
56
1
0
59
Likely Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Benign
0
0
0
0
0
Total3561060

LoF = frameshift, stop gained/lost, canonical splice · Counts from ClinVar esearch · Updated hourly

View in ClinVar →

9 pathogenic / likely-pathogenic (of 15) ClinVar copy-number / structural variants overlap DMAP1 — these span large chromosomal regions, not the gene specifically, and are excluded from the counts above. Explore in CNV tools →

Protein Context — Lollipop Plot

DMAP1 · protein map & ClinVar variants

Showing all ClinVar variants across the protein. Search a specific variant to highlight its position.

Clinical Trials

Active and recruiting trials from ClinicalTrials.gov

No active trials found for this gene.

Search ClinicalTrials.gov →